Aquifer Exemption Hearing.
About 40 people at the Rally.
About 100 at the hearing. Press coverage.
Heidi spokesperson always good.
Comments inside just amazing. Covered the whole spectrum of concerns. Homeowners with horror stories and concern for their water. Facts and stats from Maya and Ash from the Center for Biological Diversity let DOGGR know exemptions don’t make it safe or legal. Sierra Club about the earthquake factor no one else seems to be addressing and just blows holes in the “it is safe” rhetoric. Andrew from Clean Water Action getting DOGGR to extend comment time. Our neighbors to the south, Becca and Janet troupe from Santa Barbara showed up for support. Thank you, thank you.
Supervisor Hill there letting DOGGR know the Board of Supervisors does not appreciate the lack of communications and information. Way to go Adam.
No one was buying DOGGR and Freeport’s take on the situation.
There was a stenographer there recording every word we said for the record. I didn’t know they still did stenography.
I think the rubber stamping of this project just got waylaid. Not going to be as easy as they thought. There were points made that need addressing and can’t be ignored.
Here are some news clips. http://www.ksby.com/…/public-meeting-on-proposed-arroyo-gra…
Grover Beach City Council packed the house too protesting the Oil Train spur. We are on this SLO!
If you didn’t get a chance to submit comments on exemption still time. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org ATTN: San Luis Obispo HEARING 09-21-2015
Two things I noticed you might comment on. 1) The earthquake issue. What is faster than a speeding bullet? Can level tall buildings in a single bound? An earthquake. We know there are 3 faults on the ARRoyo Grande property. We don’t need any seismic testing to prove this fact. One fault line is all it takes to compromise their ‘safe, impermeable bowl shaped aquifer theory”
We also know for a fact that there is no instrumentation and technology now that can accurately measure what is going on sub surface to detect, track, record, nooks and crannies, fissures, lesions, holes, weaknesses that could occur and compromise the integrity of the aquifer and in particular when there is any kind of earth movement which can happen any time.
California Council on Science and Technology testified that that technology is at least 3 years down the road. In the meantime there is over a 1.5 billion gallons of toxic waste gurgling underground just waiting to make a break at the first chance it gets. And where it goes no body knows. A 2.0 earthquake could do it. High Pressure steam injection could do it.
And, one more thing. What is the complaint process if this ‘can’t fail’ ‘fail safe’ plan fails? There is no formal, official, legally binding complaint process for the citizenry to file when an accident, spill, noxious smells, dumping, explosion, noise, funny tasting water, blinding lights, whatever happens. NONE.
There never has been any clearly defined official, must-respond-and-investigate complaint mechanism in place for the oil drilling process. Without it, ever complaint filed is immediately tossed into the find-the-regulation-and-agency-responsible, file.
No body knows who is in charge of complaints not even the agencies in charge and there are over 3,000 of them for water issues alone in California. To compound the PROBLEM, determining if it is a local, state or Federal issue can lead to years of searching and filing complaints that lead nowhere. Case in point. West Adams in LA has been 10 years playing this game trying to get someone, anyone to address water, air and soil contamination of their neighborhood by drilling rigs in their backyard.
We need to know, we have a right to know, how to file an formal, official complaint and a set time for the response and resolution. Otherwise the only solution is the individual takes a shot in the dark agency or company to court and that is cost prohibitive and can also take years.
So we need a mechanism built into the regulatory agency in charge of approving and permitting oil drilling operations that has a clear, concise, formal, official complaint form readily and easily accessible to every person.
Solution: Must insist this complaint process is in place and functional before they approve anything.
Next event, October. 22, Planning commission continuance meeting on extending 31 wells conditional use permit for 3 years. Can send emails to planning commission if you can’t make the meeting for public comment. It made a difference last time.
We are winning. We showed up and that is what it takes. And with a little help from our friends will put us over the top!!!